Some Brands Aren’t Spending Like YouTube Is The New TV
The Persistent YouTube-TV Budget Gap
Despite YouTube consistently ranking as the most-watched streaming service in the U.S. for over two years, a significant disconnect remains in how advertisers allocate their funds. New data reveals that while YouTube viewing on television sets is skyrocketing, the advertising budgets dedicated to the platform often still pale in comparison to those reserved for traditional linear TV. This hesitancy persists even as global TV ad spending is projected to reach $167.4 billion in 2026, a lucrative pie that YouTube is aggressively courting.
The core of the issue lies in legacy media planning. For years, agencies have siloed YouTube into categories like "online video" or "social media," separating it conceptually from the prestige and planned upfront buys of television. However, two pivotal studies released in early 2026 signal a change is underway. Research from Pixability found that 62% of U.S. agencies plan to include YouTube in their connected-TV (CTV) ad buys this year. Similarly, Tinuiti's analysis of actual ad spend showed that 67% of U.S. YouTube campaigns in Q4 2025 were attributed to TV screens, indicating a tangible shift in where ads are being served and consumed.
YouTube's Unstoppable March to the Living Room
YouTube's transformation from a desktop-centric platform to a primary living room entertainment hub is nearly complete. Nielsen data confirms it now generates more watch time than any linear broadcast network. This isn't just about on-demand cat videos; it's about live sports, news, and major events. The platform's exclusive stream of an NFL game in São Paulo reached an average-minute audience of 19.7 million global viewers, with ad inventory selling out in weeks. Future tentpoles like the Oscars streaming deal starting in 2029 solidify YouTube as a must-buy for mass, simultaneous viewership.
From Mobile-First to TV-First Viewing
The device shift is profound. For the first time, U.S. viewers now spend more time on YouTube via TV screens than on mobile phones. Advertisers are following this eyeball migration. Tinuiti's Q1 2025 data marked a historic tipping point: brands spent 43% of their YouTube campaign dollars on TV screens, edging out mobile (42%). This represents a near-doubling of TV ad spend share from just 24% a year prior, clearly tracing the trajectory of consumer behavior and marketer response.
The Stubborn Barriers Holding Budgets Back
So why isn't the floodgate of TV money fully open? Significant perceptual and practical hurdles remain. First, the content itself. While premium broadcasters host their channels on YouTube, a vast ocean of user-generated content lacks the made-for-TV production quality and vetting that brands associate with a safe, premium environment. As Lindsey Clay of Thinkbox notes, traditional TV is fully regulated with pre-vetted content, offering a brand safety layer that open platforms struggle to match.
Second, the structural legacy of TV advertising favors upfront commitments that provide revenue certainty for networks. The digital auction model, while flexible, doesn't yet command the same perceived scarcity and prestige for major brand campaigns. Kate Scott-Dawkins of WPP Media points out that while the U.S. and UK are merging YouTube and CTV planning, "traditional silos remain intact" in many other global markets, slowing uniform adoption.
Decoding the Cost of YouTube TV Advertising
Understanding the investment required is crucial. Advertising on YouTube TV—the live-TV streaming service—is a different beast from buying ads on the main YouTube platform. It commands TV-level prices for TV-level attention. Through Google's managed services, minimum spends can hit $35,000 with base CPMs (cost per thousand impressions) starting above $32, mirroring traditional TV's premium.
Accessibility for Smaller Players
However, the landscape is democratizing. Programmatic CTV platforms now aggregate YouTube TV inventory, allowing smaller businesses to start campaigns with budgets as low as $50 and CPMs around $20-25. For a $500 test, a local business can secure approximately 20,000 non-skippable impressions during live programming—a far cry from the unreachable minimums of the past and a compelling value compared to lower-completion-rate ads on regular YouTube.
How Forward-Thinking Brands Are Adapting
The innovators are already moving. They're not just reallocating digital dollars; they're rethinking video strategy holistically. This means creating 15-30 second, high-quality commercials designed for the big screen and undivided attention. It involves leveraging YouTube's advanced targeting within this TV context, using geographic, demographic, and even daypart overlays to reach specific audiences during live sports or prime-time shows, much like traditional TV but with digital precision.
Brands like Verizon and Lucid have capitalized on sold-out live event inventory. The strategy is shifting from thinking of YouTube as a cheap, skippable touchpoint to valuing it as a premium, brand-building vehicle that can deliver mass reach and cultural relevance, especially as YouTube further develops exclusive, must-see TV content.
The Inevitable Convergence of TV and Digital Video
The lines between TV and YouTube are blurring beyond recognition. Brian Binder of Tinuiti aptly stated we are "very close to a tipping point where more traditional TV budgets start flowing to YouTube." The metrics are aligning: watch time, audience quality, and ad format evolution. YouTube has introduced TV-exclusive ad products like pause ads and longer unskippable spots, explicitly designed for the lean-back viewing experience.
The future belongs to agile advertisers who abandon outdated categorical silos. Success won't be about choosing TV over YouTube, but about strategically deploying budgets across a video landscape where the dominant screen is connected, the content is both live and on-demand, and the audience is undeniably present. The brands that spend like YouTube is the new TV will be the ones defining the next era of advertising relevance and impact.